This side event, entitled “Protection of Human Rights in the Digital Space: Experiences and Best Practices of National Human Rights Institutions,” was held on 31 March 2026 at the Palais des Nations in Geneva (Room VIII), within the framework of the GANHRI Annual Meeting 2026 (30 March – 1 April 2026, United Nations Office at Geneva). https://youtu.be/kaaaDlRRrtA Organized by Ms. Feruza Farkhodovna Eshmatova, Commissioner of the Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan for H

PRESS RELEASE Geneva, 1 April 2026  — On 8 March 2026, Justice pour Tous Internationale (JPTi) formally submitted an amicus curiae memorandum to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Estonia (Riigikohus) in constitutional review case No. 5-25-49, following the Court’s confirmation on 26 February 2026 that JPTi could provide its opinion in the proceedings. The submission was prepared by Emeritus Professor Douwe Korff, was filed in English, and was accompanied by a full Estonian

Geneva —  On 25 March 2026, during its 61st session, the United Nations Human Rights Council adopted, without a vote, resolution A/HRC/61/L.38 as orally revised. The full text of the resolution is accessible here: https://docs.un.org/A/HRC/61/L.38 The text, introduced by members of the Gulf Cooperation Council and Jordan, addresses the human rights implications of events of 28 February 2026 involving the Islamic Republic of Iran and several States in the Gulf region. The urge

On 16–17 March 2026, Justice pour Tous Internationale (JPTi), a Geneva-based human rights organization, participated in the OSCE Supplementary Human Dimension Meeting I (SHDM I) on “Lawmaking for Democratic Resilience,” held in Vienna. The meeting brought together representatives of OSCE participating States, international organizations, independent oversight bodies, and civil society to examine challenges and best practices in democratic lawmaking and institutional accountab

PRESS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Geneva, 23 February 2026 — Justice pour Tous Internationale (JPTi) welcomes the principled constitutional leadership demonstrated by President Alar Karis in safeguarding freedom of religion and freedom of association in Estonia. The President’s repeated refusal to promulgate the 2025 amendments to the Churches and Congregations Act (KiKoS), followed by his referral of the legislation to the Supreme Court of Estonia (Riigikohus), reflects a